Do you have a sense of how hard this would be to fix? It would be lovely to have some reasonable namespace control without having to take chunks of the namespace as all-or-nothing pieces....
y
David Teller wrote:No, it is not the case.
I thought the linker only linked in symbols which were actually used?
The only automatic mechanism for code pruning is at the level of individual modules embedded in a library. As soon as you pack, you obtain a monolithic module which can only be linked as a whole.
-- Alain
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs