From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AFEBC6C for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:47:50 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAAVdokfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQIgEBAQgKKZcohWU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,289,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7500671" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2008 08:47:50 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m117ln3U015589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:47:49 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAAVdokdA6aawlWdsb2JhbACQIgEBAQEHBAQJChYClyiFZQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,289,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7500670" Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.176]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2008 08:47:49 +0100 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1431700pyb.10 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:47:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer:sender; bh=FOKUENhgMKNSChMxJVZCZ/7PCjY398Op08CkNutlPB8=; b=aeIk4Pg+PppoEqmJgwidT+JGT2/hq+zbcJh6QIf4kbZWUnhUjw5FkApnv0U+ojgWF+hm6nZABTuPj6wHYMc1ebTZD3YmkZH8NhlERKGa6fcpLvBLWYvnFYBjjEazxtYUuyn0MtWIU2LtwRMsPt7lm0TGsImvI18znG5P9/W9bP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer:sender; b=ilsyfqHMiTnCJiw2GZh4/4qCAioUL/KiulTZ1AcbiwcGVHcfO+z/u8TdWziOBok1B5cpOc2To/qqI9T+QcVfWHSoW8pf5eKVsej2AlUDDhPgCG7vxBJaw0FseCHYrX2kAAQ+/onufXJyP8OeeuO3Jrlw3Y7cB/+SLa4Fbnmedyc= Received: by 10.65.241.20 with SMTP id t20mr4738244qbr.88.1201852067817; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:47:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.58? ( [85.0.108.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2sm7457620nfc.11.2008.01.31.23.47.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:47:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <89B95036-D3D1-41FD-B99A-ED46D54BF89E@erratique.ch> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=FCnzli_Daniel?= To: caml-list List In-Reply-To: <861w7xb0gi.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:47:46 +0100 References: <9d3ec8300801310157r77b86fc0k80f40b1df36091c2@mail.gmail.com> <0640C30E-07B5-4885-AC38-671755BB79AA@erratique.ch> <47A1D68B.70700@fmf.uni-lj.si> <861w7xb0gi.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Sender: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel=20B=FCnzli?= X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47A2CEA5.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bunzli:01 buenzli:01 bunzli:01 buenzli:01 emphasizes:01 jot:98 jot:98 caml-list:01 writes:01 native:03 native:03 sys:03 sys:03 daniel:04 daniel:04 Le 1 f=E9vr. 08 =E0 08:27, Micha=EBl Gr=FCnewald a =E9crit : > B=FCnzli Daniel writes: > >>> time jot 1000000 | ./in.native >> >> real 0m4.814s >> user 0m4.371s >> sys 0m0.218s > > You are timing `jot' aren't you? Not really, only half of the time. See at the end of this email. > The recommendation you proposed would be even more useful if it > emphasizes when ``Exceptionless error management'' is adequate. Right. I'll try to do something along this line. I'll will highlight =20 in the suggestions part (which is not part of the recommendation) that =20= in Unix-like cases the recommendation should maybe not be followed. Best, Daniel > jot 1000000 > lines.txt > time ./in.native < lines.txt real 0m6.093s user 0m2.132s sys 0m0.219s > time ./inb.native < lines.txt real 0m6.827s user 0m2.117s sys 0m0.218s