From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA067F723 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:30:40 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am8RAI+NVVNKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABZhhuBIMI8DgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogk+BCwImAkkWG4g5BJssjx+jPheBKZAvNYEUBJ8vF48q X-IPAS-Result: Am8RAI+NVVNKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABZhhuBIMI8DgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogk+BCwImAkkWG4g5BJssjx+jPheBKZAvNYEUBJ8vF48q X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,898,1389740400"; d="scan'208";a="58150263" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2014 23:30:37 +0200 Received: from [172.20.10.2] (34-236.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.236.34]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D1D209CF5F for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:30:31 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: caml list Message-ID: <8F9F12A8E9C94118A453E000BC387897@erratique.ch> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Caml-list] non-optional labels in signatures Hello, This is certainly a question for Jacques Garrigue. I'm asking out of pure curiosity if there's a particular reason why non-optional labels in signatures don't have the ~ ? Is to save a keystroke ? (I happen to make the error of putting them in signatures fairly often) Best, Daniel