From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA06659; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:08:11 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA05817 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:08:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6UM88SH022566 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:08:09 +0200 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 75so59160rnl for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.92.31 with SMTP id p31mr68692rnb; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8ef0e63e04073015082e56cf41@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:08:08 -0400 From: Konstantin Ignatiev To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] XEmacs or GNU Emacs? In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 410AC6C8.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 2004:99 brandon:99 cygwin:01 cygwin:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 0700,:01 emacs:01 emacs:01 coding:03 wrote:03 gnu:05 gnu:05 probably:05 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:35:54 -0700, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: > Does either XEmacs or GNU Emacs have any particular advantage to an > OCaml developer on Windows 2000? I'm becoming aware that there's a lot > of politics about them, but hopefully people around here are > disinterested and only concerned with what makes OCaml coding easier. > Again, I'm doing Windows. Well, if you are using OCaml on WIndows, you probably need Cygwin (at least as an alternative testing environment), so you can use Cygwin version of (X)Emacs, which are much better integrated with the environment (I prefer GNU Emacs, though I'd agree that there isn't such a big difference, especially if you are not using multi-language features) -- Konstantin. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners