From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vshabanoff@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71B0BC0A
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue,  5 Jun 2007 17:06:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229])
	by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l55F6i0t014640
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:06:45 +0200
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s9so1577742wxc
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=YwjwGDJHmg2PqEDbBTtLT8g/G92tU5NegHMFGRUXEmAQvEIbh9XrpS18Q7O+ZvyTZ9qIIvmohU1+CT1DiLjng0dEb41oA8/tF0vqKhxuIcIJNA7gsJnxhIoNL2AyHV8jblmMJfOJipuNy9xWhbzr/tdsbM12g7DxeJaTMuOMENk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=H3SjPlwy4g6rjul3MIfoKU/WQfF8QGGrNNFdQfphkBf2ROp5OfKh0/oySmGsgdjRRC25DUSTsyknGCgGk0D/6rvhnDxlO2Gyy+nfhI+IGlZuFvBYqW8lrRw55aOm1xKGNIe4kbxxjLZPFJQGhrHVPy4k7NP++6EOxsgr7s271kc=
Received: by 10.70.129.6 with SMTP id b6mr1467993wxd.1181056004085;
        Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.33.7 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8ef825670706050806t27d0871dncd66a58a4093d958@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:06:44 +0400
From: "Vladimir Shabanov" <vshabanoff@gmail.com>
To: "Caml List" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamldoc -pack
In-Reply-To: <466574A7.8010002@tsc.uc3m.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <6579f8680706011452l6f3e4cfbr3562bba9b267e19@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8ef825670706050605r4a7fb6eaib0da977399b8c29@mail.gmail.com>
	 <466574A7.8010002@tsc.uc3m.es>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 46657C04.002 on discorde : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 0.000 -> 1
X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 46657C04.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocamldoc:01 -pack:01 -pack:01 ocamldoc:01 valverde:01 valverde:01 mli:01 mli:01 yaron:01 minsky:01 yminsky:01 more-or-less:01 2002,:98 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 

I personally don't use ocamlbuild, since it doesn't support C++ files.
And even if it does, the -pack is ocamldoc problem, not ocamlbuild
one.

2007/6/5, Francisco Jos? Valverde Albacete <fva@tsc.uc3m.es>:
> er... Wouldn't this be the kind of scripting that ocamlbuild would be
> most useful for?
>
> Regards,
>
>     Fran Valverde
>
> Vladimir Shabanov wrote:
> > I'm also looked for this feature some time ago. Seems that there is no
> > support in ocamldoc for it.
> >
> > The quick and dirty solution I've used is to catenate all packed .ml &
> > .mli in one file and then use ocamldoc on it.
> >
> > Here the little script I've used (it just print catenated modules,
> > which are passed as arguments, and if you have .mli file you must pass
> > it just before corresponding .ml):
> > http://camlosg.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/camlosg/trunk/camlosg/Make/pack_in_one.ml?view=markup
> >
> >
> > But it would be much better if this will be supported in ocamldoc
> > directly.
> >
> > 2007/6/5, Yaron Minsky <yminsky@cs.cornell.edu>:
> >> As it happens we're looking for more-or-less the same feature.  Is it
> >> true,
> >> as this post suggests, that ocamldoc is broken with respect to pack'd
> >> libraries?
> >>
> >> y
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/1/07, Sean McLaughlin <seanmcl@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> >   I'd like to see a -pack option for ocamldoc.  It would be nice for
> >> packed modules to
> >> > have accurate documentation.  I saw something about this in a post
> >> > from 2002, but nothing afterwards.   Is this a possibility in the
> >> future?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Sean