From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <michal.m.pl@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90942BB84
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:28:45 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwDAEcVmUnRVdrYmWdsb2JhbACUIj8BAQEBAQgLCgcRrUaBCI1DAQMBA4QZBg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,216,1233529200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="23033402"
Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com ([209.85.218.216])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2009 16:28:45 +0100
Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so6845271bwz.9
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:28:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=4XMtjIQ4BhZsGuRxRCzPxVWAK019yEU7koeEVL1s8Ys=;
        b=tyodRYub51MRVwYLLQ+eHaZnT1K2E2+tDY1tjOWOuB5/N5Qq+v60YJ90lteKn71hVn
         N2Lp9GMfrNCJEgQGFDaENOY2Hq4YpqbpDCViWO/0mL0kDCCEP3yUdrVZF3aMs31cD40d
         UJPTy1rzc8wnX2pFdYCxvUkeKrqGNnn+qoKYk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=vJQ3BKIXuNFU5CTseUVxu7wRRIi78jvuKWZvOC4FiLDXJsvdYVSRs63Q7hidftC7Ba
         jExboRU8gQniS1+Iyno+sLPM5aJcJDAXgBV4drHuum6E7TaLWm3pcpjEL/v9k1zqBAVR
         kOPd++XmfVPEnLQ5A1POY/98jdv+cNluG2BtA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.181.192.10 with SMTP id u10mr1109412bkp.185.1234798125076; 
	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:28:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2184b2340902160715y1f935b5ehc0e6195b3f75b66b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2184b2340902160715y1f935b5ehc0e6195b3f75b66b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:28:45 +0100
Message-ID: <906164100902160728i49d9a8ffme547f92d7ffb04fd@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [Caml-list] Threads performance issue.
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Maciejewski?= <michal.m.pl@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam: no; 0.00; michal:01 ocaml:01 2009:98 threads:01 caml-list:01 remi:01 remi:01 guess:04 might:12 doesn't:12 think:13 think:13 thinks:13 issue:14 use:16 

Hi,

2009/2/16 R=E9mi Dewitte <remi@gide.net>:
> I guess it might come from GC slowing down thinks here, doesn't it ?
I don't think so. Why do you think it's GC?

> Can ocaml use multiple cores ?
No and as far as I know it's because of GC. ;-)

regards
Miichal