From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED44BB81 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:41:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [128.93.8.130] (macadam.inria.fr [128.93.8.130]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jB8EfF9A013325 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:41:15 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <1134025910.8948.44.camel@rosella> References: <1134009551.10435.24.camel@rosella> <20051208.121012.49167263.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <1134025910.8948.44.camel@rosella> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <911EF004-86B6-4E07-8412-1500A4945D15@inria.fr> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Damien Doligez Subject: Re: [Caml-list] partial application warning unreliable? Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:41:15 +0100 To: caml-list X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4398460B.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; damien:01 damien:01 caml-list:01 flags:01 minimise:01 orthogonal:01 iirc:01 orthogonal:01 wrote:01 doligez:01 doligez:01 partial:01 partial:01 argument:01 btw:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Dec 8, 2005, at 08:11, skaller wrote: > BTW: the error flags documentation is very confusing: > > A/a enable/disable all warnings > X/x enable/disable all other warnings > > other than what? Other than [B-WYZ], obviously. There's only so much you can write in the on-line help message before people stop reading it altogether. > I am using -w yz but STILL get > warning X, unused function argument .. some of this > happens in Frontc/CIL which I'm using and I would like > to minimise patches. Warnings are orthogonal: disabling Y and Z does not disable X. It has no impact on X. > BTW: what is this for? > > S/s enable/disable non-unit statement IIRC, it's for non-unit statements that are not partial applications. > If I turn off F, will I get S instead? Warnings are orthogonal: disabling F does not make you get more S warnings. It has no impact on S. -- Damien