From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <raould@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17C1BB84
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:27:41 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnIBAPlgcElKfSwckGdsb2JhbACTRj4BAQEBCQkMBxEDq2KBA40SAQMBA4Vv
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,278,1231110000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="22602294"
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.28])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2009 19:27:31 +0100
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so698051yxj.3
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:27:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=9wUsgb7ZUvVRGtG6KdcfbWNRifyOWqiHGu6PC7Lz2xU=;
        b=bxOPTZ/aCa9EXNdiZxxijSqqSn6/J8x+6+x78AsBZWL4299kIzpISjX/rti6LGl+qm
         Krtx9WleE3CJ16vhcPyWXizeuR2RmdG3g368lIRRrjfGJt3ExhE9g3B8TgcrCimYq5og
         BGQzfnrg4+gkYdVHiv20HCyORsKNCruAeOaOE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=WeBANKB2PgkFbwVXgM7peLXjf6VOt4Fws+2/SRCscl0G0vJoI1Qba6zEUoadVKIEzc
         Hj1J57liwrkaOmrFY88AwmiheaDDLNUVqfLXrxUp6bA3vEh62MdmwkBJqeNn0F7bvCHz
         oS3drgETQFRJse1RrmKFyjP49a5NrURru632g=
Received: by 10.142.125.4 with SMTP id x4mr1148873wfc.75.1232130449813;
        Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:27:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.232.14 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:27:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <91a2ba3e0901161027x5432afcbh504b4ca3df501851@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:27:29 -0800
From: "Raoul Duke" <raould@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?
In-Reply-To: <FCB84B14-903B-4DC9-949E-F4190C6D4873@osu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <FCB84B14-903B-4DC9-949E-F4190C6D4873@osu.edu>
X-Spam: no; 0.00; subtyping:01 disturbing:98 caml-list:01 substitution:01 inheritance:03 inheritance:03 constructive:03 correctly:04 applied:05 htm:88 what's:14 www:84 bad:21 when:22 com:74 

> the Liskov's substitution principle was violated. I have violated it myself
> ...
> So, when correctly applied, what's so disturbing about inheritance? You

i like these food-for-thought / throw-gasoline-on-the-fire articles
about the general subject:

http://alistair.cockburn.us/Constructive+deconstruction+of+subtyping

http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/626998.htm

sincerely.