From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <raould@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDF4BBC4
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed,  4 Mar 2009 02:10:04 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmECAPRjrUlKfSweimdsb2JhbACUSD8BAQEKCQwHDwWwL4EHkAkBAwEDhAUG
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,297,1233529200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="36052335"
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2009 02:10:04 +0100
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 31so1833958yxl.3
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:10:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=XSr5Dyvy2aIRCYNg58sHBd3aY5DqboF1UZB+KnTUz48=;
        b=Bt4EsKQ9rfwIifEqAGOP8ABVsvPfk5gmz34AhjUOjGkzNoMPvFyMo46mc7eQfr5mjm
         el2g+PrvzcNQ96LtQm+KNfaT3HBznTNmjopS/teNMlaVL6k/pqK1CKBQl3l/5Cs0CP9/
         fIH/OU1LBZKI0OfI1aJlel7U62EiUq5HsM7Uk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=NdhTaxs3/bwaGTLTobUC+ssyKbMM6FOr/CB5OvzgWAuzrEooO6vnqw4QgVv/su2JQh
         CxkCtNf/0LujL35XCQRodSfmXB92j2l1W6x5cb5T77FF2dED0ErhuGG+ZrDhpHEQcr8y
         tGbHmycTH3OujoLwvQH4bzWzfmgb/Gi8pX1hQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.44.14 with SMTP id w14mr7072050ybj.3.1236129003060; Tue, 
	03 Mar 2009 17:10:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87vdqqyugc.fsf@aryx.cs.uiuc.edu>
References: <91a2ba3e0903031340wcdc976cp52522eb35f7ccb73@mail.gmail.com>
	 <87zlg2z19g.fsf@aryx.cs.uiuc.edu>
	 <200903032336.53089.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
	 <87vdqqyugc.fsf@aryx.cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:10:02 -0800
Message-ID: <91a2ba3e0903031710t140bc407n217aa388cc4195c8@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] stl?
From: Raoul Duke <raould@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; stl:01 monads:01 haskell:01 caml-list:01 modules:02 mostly:11 research:12 idea:13 issue:14 language:15 thanks:17 too:17 really:19 really:19 bad:21 

> modules. That's really really really intrusive. It's exactly why
> monads in haskell are mostly a bad idea. They are too intrusive. If in

what are the current best language/research/advanced/alternative
solutions for this issue?

thanks.