From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <raould@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2832BBC4
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu,  5 Mar 2009 18:50:39 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar4CAFufr0lKfSwckGdsb2JhbACUQT8BAQEBCQkMBxEDsniBB49/AQMBA4QFBg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,308,1233529200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="25132532"
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.28])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2009 18:50:39 +0100
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 31so32129yxl.3
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:50:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=WbX0P3xpLbh2+RzPxlTR+IJUe2D3qcmKdoahYjMtu10=;
        b=rvhD/qWyrn5oftFJQSwdpqZ1EgEG4L1ws2SbZpg5NvMzznDNi2o023HNTjvsj5eNlH
         BUZbjQGGMdlUf3XxN5mVxrPvYfbUIaMxP3moFLsnbsQp5QqHm9crhnli2RMgU16wSicq
         cPSNDvYrB2iM4uSpHoURMDrm5aLTzJOYwZpXc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=hpNGOmCzpljqLKoxGMlZSAyHq2zLpxryHWFNDs9t/WENxc50cXvjbRFmpWzJMjjizX
         SOKl1XSg+/3hTG/kVUEQUz1/MUGDjyfYLfjraltcFfLZXqNA92OYSPuWR55vv5/PgPyL
         O56sTWuO4ML+S5+7VajH6hgfkER4XP9V9YAPU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.199.16 with SMTP id w16mr2593476ybf.217.1236275438640; 
	Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:50:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20090305085950.GA24055@annexia.org>
References: <91a2ba3e0903031340wcdc976cp52522eb35f7ccb73@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200903042250.36421.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
	 <49AF0C3D.2030009@naughtydog.com>
	 <200903050131.03494.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
	 <49AF35B8.9030104@naughtydog.com> <20090305085950.GA24055@annexia.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:50:38 -0800
Message-ID: <91a2ba3e0903050950r6b130cc0n91a92bb78b4205a8@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] stl?
From: Raoul Duke <raould@gmail.com>
To: "caml-list@yquem.inria.fr" <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; stl:01 vectors:01 caml-list:01 lisp:02 seems:03 ditto:09 bit:11 might:12 sort:12 enough:14 adapted:16 close:21 that:23 com:74 still:26 

> This is the sort of thing that OCaml-bitstring might be adapted to do.

ditto lisp "bit vectors"? still, seems sorta not close enough.