* llvm?
@ 2010-02-10 22:51 Raoul Duke
2010-02-11 1:33 ` [Caml-list] llvm? Jon Harrop
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Raoul Duke @ 2010-02-10 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OCaml
hi,
any news about / anybody working on ocaml-on-llvm?
just curious.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] llvm?
2010-02-10 22:51 llvm? Raoul Duke
@ 2010-02-11 1:33 ` Jon Harrop
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jon Harrop @ 2010-02-11 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 22:51:33 Raoul Duke wrote:
> hi,
>
> any news about / anybody working on ocaml-on-llvm?
I don't believe anyone is working on porting OCaml to LLVM.
The nearest work is probably my own HLVM project which reached a major
milestone recently and is now capable of high-performance parallel
programming:
http://flyingfrogblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/naive-parallelism-with-hlvm.html
From the point of view of an OCaml programmer, HLVM is a DSL that drops
various features from OCaml (e.g. polymorphic recursion) in order to provide
easily-obtained, predictable and high performance.
--
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-11 0:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-10 22:51 llvm? Raoul Duke
2010-02-11 1:33 ` [Caml-list] llvm? Jon Harrop
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).