From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C88BC37
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:22:17 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlsBAA8tIUtKfU4akGdsb2JhbACEFJZnPwEBAQEJCQwHEwOrGoFahUyIagECAwWBKoIqUgSCfRuIDQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,378,1257116400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="39673084"
Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.26])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Dec 2009 02:22:17 +0100
Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so163576eye.7
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:22:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
         :content-type;
        bh=m/xxMOcBZn0D+QkeDrEuPMMogsYSEvBZM+5o2bC/Yg4=;
        b=DsCYTs/TZl5by/Jek6XcIOdfgEYeWw8qp5IKxrQDkbEnustNVbfog6K194udf/IMmx
         1f3KPJE4OwV8RAGKnYlNgMTmy93XN8DBKn3jhhnNfx+h/CmrppINup7PnNxf6ko3b8LI
         rd6syO1lf8u9FtoC8toi8DhZJT2POBPp/KQZc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=AfxusBf579RRwi8jOv9vJ7N+fJQsSQFCmTe917AundYVmd9+luyaLam1uMec2PIvjm
         MbwbJF8lyLGFdAm1wsxgCSjaeDumznRRzLXhGNvXtr/Df0CwnnOY/ZhWRaw6XSB5B1lx
         wr2X9WNGygXzOoWyUmrgxagzUnLaqF3qrWluk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.213.96.6 with SMTP id f6mr721272ebn.81.1260494536822; Thu, 10 
	Dec 2009 17:22:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B216AFE.80802@citycable.ch>
References: <4B1F0E3A.3040907@citycable.ch>
	 <91a3da520912082353m5c75f307j6f9542877d84841f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B1FEB40.5050801@citycable.ch>
	 <91a3da520912100024x5273462bs960efaebd6dff1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B216AFE.80802@citycable.ch>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:22:16 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 035337447d48c8a4
Message-ID: <91a3da520912101722i34d75a23n2dafa157e522c41b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Recursion on React.events.
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: guillaume.yziquel@citycable.ch
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam: no; 0.00; recursion:01 buenzli:01 authors:03 suggestion:03 module:03 daniel:04 daniel:04 ignoring:05 depend:07 definition:07 i'm:09 i'm:09 clicked:10 maybe:10 think:13 

> I think you should really make a direct link to this page from either

Well, there's one thing I cannot do for you is to learn to browse.
There are at least 11 direct links to these pages from React.html,
without counting the two direct module definition links which I
thought you would have clicked at some point.

Now I'm very impressed you went that far ignoring all this documentation.

About Lwt, I'm open to any suggestion to make react easier to interact
with (however at the moment I don't want react to depend on Lwt). Lwt
is also something I want to get into at some point but now is not the
time.  I saw some kind of support was added to Lwt for react. If the
authors of Lwt are on this list, maybe they want to comment on what
their vision is.

Best,

Daniel