From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] CCSS 1.0
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:54:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91a3da521003110654x37d8a551u948c39889b64fdba@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <594748.67259.qm@web111501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> I understand why you may see this as a bug, but for me it's a feature.
> Personal experience tells me that mixing units -- even if they belong
> to the same system, as cm and mm -- is asking for trouble (never mind
> mixing units from metric and imperial -- ask NASA).
Well you're not in a NASA case since all the data is tagged correctly.
> But anyway, if you really think unit conversion is a must-have feature,
> I can add it to the next release (it's actually simple to implement).
> However, personally I remain sceptical about its real-world usefulness.
For the web I anyway use more relative lengths than absolute ones. I
don't know if it's a must have feature however I can see that being
annoying if you have to do an absolute layout (e.g. for print).
The problem is that different kind of objects naturally use different
kind of units.
A font size or line height for example is usually expressed in pts and
a standard paper or photographic print size will be in cms (or
inches).
Having to use a calculator to add them just feels wrong and makes the
resulting stylesheet less readable : if I see 210mm x 297mm I
recognize quite easily A4, however if I see 595.275591pt x
841.889764pt, well, no. Conversely a value in pt for a line height or
font size will give me a better idea of the typographical result than
a value in mm.
Best,
Daniel
P.S.
I know about metric typographic units [1] but somehow they didn't
catch and most people still think in pts in typography.
[1] http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/metric-typo/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-10 19:16 Dario Teixeira
2010-03-10 21:09 ` [Caml-list] " Daniel Bünzli
2010-03-11 13:34 ` Dario Teixeira
2010-03-11 14:54 ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
2010-03-11 19:00 ` Dario Teixeira
2010-03-12 13:10 ` Daniel Bünzli
2010-03-12 15:43 ` Dario Teixeira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91a3da521003110654x37d8a551u948c39889b64fdba@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=darioteixeira@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).