From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: by margaux.inria.fr, Mon, 28 Dec 92 15:46:51 +0100
Received: from Relay.Prime.COM by margaux.inria.fr, Sat, 26 Dec 92 01:18:22 +0100
Received: from flora.ccs.northeastern.edu by Relay.Prime.COM; 25 Dec 92 19:21:45 EST
Received: from damon (damon.ccs.northeastern.edu) by flora.ccs.northeastern.edu (4.0/SMI-4.1)
	id AA10504; Fri, 25 Dec 92 19:16:39 EST
Received: by damon (5.57/SMI-3.2+CCS-subsidiary-2.2)
	id AA29109; Fri, 25 Dec 92 19:16:24 -0500
From: steck@damon.ccs.northeastern.edu (Paul Steckler)
Message-Id: <9212260016.AA29109@damon>
Subject: CAML on multiple architectures
To: caml-list@margaux (CAML Mailing List)
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 92 19:16:23 EST
Reply-To: steck@corwin.ccs.northeastern.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Sender: weis@margaux

I wish to install CAML V3.1 on multiple architectures.  All the
architectures share an NFS-mounted disk, so, if possible, I'd like to
put the library code there.  Can the executables share this code?
Is it possible to specify, either during installation or via
an environment variable, where the interpreter finds library code?
Any details on how to set this up would be appreciated.

Also, how compatible are CAML program with CAML Light (and vice-versa)?
One motivation for installing CAML is so that I can take CAML Light
programs written on my PC, and run them under CAML on a UNIX box --
and vice-versa.

-- Paul

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Steckler                       |  Desperately seeking clever     |
| steck@dworkin.ccs.northeastern.edu  |    new .signature slogan        |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------