From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: by margaux.inria.fr, Thu, 27 May 93 11:06:53 +0200
Received: from concorde.inria.fr by margaux.inria.fr, Thu, 27 May 93 11:00:04 +0200
Received: from pamir.inria.fr by concorde.inria.fr; Thu, 27 May 1993 11:00:43 +0200
X400-Received: by /PRMD=inria/ADMD=atlas/C=fr/;
 Relayed; 27 May 93 11:00:43+0200
X400-Received: by /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD= /C=gb/;
 Relayed; 27 May 93 09:00:14 GMT
X400-Received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/;
 Relayed; 27 May 93 10:00:05+0100
X400-Received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/;
 Relayed; 27 May 93 10:00:04+0100
Date: 27 May 93 10:00:04+0100
From: sd@informatics.rutherford.ac.uk
Message-Id: <9305270900.AA01570@japonica>
To: caml-list@margaux
Subject: Re: Caml and PCs
Importance: Normal
Sender: weis@margaux


> Or better, maybe there is a Windows(3.1, NT) version
> of caml being worked on ?

It's something I'm planning on doing as soon as I get
time -  but I don't know when that'll be!  I don't see any
real problems, in that my experiences of porting Unix code
to NT have been very positive.

It'd be especially interesting to make use of the threads
features of NT within Caml, but that's a slightly longer-term
project...


-- Si

Dr Simon A. Dobson

Informatics Department              \  If I'd the knack
SERC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory  \   I'd sing like
Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK.   \    Cherry flakes falling

(+44 235) 445478    sd@inf.rl.ac.uk