From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 977F67EDE3
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:02:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AigEACGgfVBKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABFhhKIDLBjAoEkAQEBAQEICwkJFCeCIQEFI1YQCw4MAiYCAkcQBhuHfAQHqCmCO5BPgSGMAoNXMmADlwCEOhONPw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,595,1344204000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="177504993"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2012 20:02:38 +0200
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (27-232.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.232.27])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741972078BD4;
	Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:02:33 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:02:30 +0200
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Lin Hong <lhong@amnh.org>
Cc: David House <dhouse@janestreet.com>, 
 "=?utf-8?Q?caml-list=40inria.fr?=" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <94BF6DC4A4904A74A1CA3ADE98B0BF75@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <C960B6881E802A459A09A7DAD55690053E7C4C5D@MAIL-MBX-004.internal.amnh.org>
References: <C960B6881E802A459A09A7DAD55690053E7C4C5D@MAIL-MBX-004.internal.amnh.org>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Segmentation fault from Array.append

If you're having a problem with your bindings, heap corruptors are usually quite easy to locate. See here :  

http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/tip-tracking-down-ocaml-heap-corruptors/

Best,

Daniel