From: Chet Murthy <murthy.chet@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Haskell vs OCaml
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:05:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9813208.KJBpLPkkvX@groupon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGmVoG15XvxWb9SEkV_uj3v7SwB4r9W0K9=8UDPVEEGghkDBoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Geez, I don't want to fan the flames of any sort of war, but .... as
long as this subject came up, I'd really like to find out if anybody
has done decent-sized-system comparisons of ocaml and haskell for
performance and footprint.
I'm a long-time Caml (and before that SML) hacker, and (hopefully)
fully appreciate the FP Nature, so it's not like I'm looking for an
argument about which language is better, etc, etc.
And I'm not looking for microbenchmarks, either. I'm looking for
-significant- systems that have been implemented in both, and
information about footprint and performance of those systems.
Why am I looking? Because if you're a bigot about your favorite
language, and -never- look for countervailing facts about the
competition, you might miss out.
Heck, that's how I became an Ocaml bigot lo' these many years.
So .... anybody got anything?
--chet--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-18 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.e3jKyg6bl9+vTkPgypQ4ZRzEoos@ifi.uio.no>
2013-03-18 9:08 ` [Caml-list] " adrian.alexander.may
2013-03-18 9:48 ` Malcolm Matalka
2013-03-18 9:59 ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-03-18 11:05 ` Adrian May
2013-03-18 11:26 ` Kakadu
2013-03-18 18:05 ` Chet Murthy [this message]
2013-03-20 20:44 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2013-03-20 21:10 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-03-21 0:26 ` Jon Harrop
2013-03-21 20:58 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-03-23 23:33 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-03-21 21:55 ` Török Edwin
2013-03-22 17:51 ` Jon Harrop
2013-03-22 18:46 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-03-22 19:53 ` Jon Harrop
2013-03-22 20:23 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-03-22 22:13 ` Jon Harrop
2013-03-22 23:35 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-03-22 23:47 ` Chet Murthy
2013-03-23 0:02 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-03-23 0:09 ` Chet Murthy
2013-03-23 1:17 ` Jon Harrop
2013-03-23 1:41 ` oliver
2013-03-23 1:15 ` Jon Harrop
2013-03-23 1:50 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-03-25 1:22 ` Francois Berenger
2013-03-23 1:25 ` oliver
2013-03-19 1:23 ` [Caml-list] " Francois Berenger
2013-03-26 10:36 ` Nicolas Braud-Santoni
2013-03-26 0:49 ` Kristopher Micinski
2013-03-26 2:37 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2013-03-26 2:57 ` Kristopher Micinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9813208.KJBpLPkkvX@groupon \
--to=murthy.chet@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).