Yes, seems so, but is there a way to make it think otherwise?
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:46:57PM +0300, dream.designer wrote:Is it not just the case that the scanner thinks %]) is a single token?
> # ([% 5 %]) ;;
> Characters 6-9:
> ([% 5 %]);;
> ^^^
> Parse error: [expr level simple] expected after "[%" (in [expr])
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat