Yes, seems so, but is there a way to make it think otherwise?

2008/6/30 Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:46:57PM +0300, dream.designer wrote:
> # ([% 5 %]) ;;
> Characters 6-9:
>   ([% 5 %]);;
>         ^^^
> Parse error: [expr level simple] expected after "[%" (in [expr])

Is it not just the case that the scanner thinks %]) is a single token?

Rich.

--
Richard Jones
Red Hat



--
vadim.shender@gmail.com