From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715BABB84 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:24:33 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0EADvPaEjAXQIn/2dsb2JhbACCQDOPTpp1hEQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,728,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="26875598" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2008 21:24:32 +0200 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m5UJOQ53023982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:24:32 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnoAAOzPaEjRVcioeGdsb2JhbACCQDOPTkMBDAMEBgcRA5l4hEQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,728,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="14677610" Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.168]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2008 21:24:31 +0200 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so1993803wfa.0 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:24:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=/CsM7sUsV+9ONVYZ+dptWN4WV9NWiG5TnwnvzPA/s/8=; b=KuAC+Wdae3ksJtJ9YiBFI+p4xLoYyxSrj76VqiWCPTaf98ONiesSqdFjIR4uwo/e2P tBtudchnVKzmvnx94+nbhxUC4Jdx8yWqFFpaKE0TkJKNy7tzeWkKNfT5+20spQeC1gfG nKD4AsQKKU2/cA8Gb4AqlLE8HvgpSbBzgANrM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=VPiTgUlUxLQAkYS5hLs2jHCz8BZBPeMLRQi9mr54J2oozpRULClw5HOPur2NVITcvE yh1f/TUQV5MPSRE+6UiiRFb2pNMszokwf+dMwsPr08ikNBJPSw6Vq8QXCtDoTjorZ1G+ 8lyvZSm25Q/2e96HO9eDm2DeTKx/LMT6RQXHY= Received: by 10.143.32.7 with SMTP id k7mr2043057wfj.305.1214853870687; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.1.3 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <982cea130806301224x7a502fcdy99a5f17f0d3402eb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:24:30 +0300 From: "Vadim Shender" To: "Richard Jones" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CamlP4 lexer problem Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20080630191815.GA13807@annexia.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6155_716187.1214853870683" References: <982cea130806301046p48b54dd5l23e81c703cb26b68@mail.gmail.com> <20080630191815.GA13807@annexia.org> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 486932EA.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 lexer:01 expr:01 expr:01 token:01 token:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 parse:02 parse:02 seems:03 seems:03 problem:05 red:92 ------=_Part_6155_716187.1214853870683 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Yes, seems so, but is there a way to make it think otherwise? 2008/6/30 Richard Jones : > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:46:57PM +0300, dream.designer wrote: > > # ([% 5 %]) ;; > > Characters 6-9: > > ([% 5 %]);; > > ^^^ > > Parse error: [expr level simple] expected after "[%" (in [expr]) > > Is it not just the case that the scanner thinks %]) is a single token? > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones > Red Hat > -- vadim.shender@gmail.com ------=_Part_6155_716187.1214853870683 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Yes, seems so, but is there a way to make it think otherwise?

2008/6/30 Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:46:57PM +0300, dream.designer wrote:
> # ([% 5 %]) ;;
> Characters 6-9:
>   ([% 5 %]);;
>         ^^^
> Parse error: [expr level simple] expected after "[%" (in [expr])

Is it not just the case that the scanner thinks %]) is a single token?

Rich.

--
Richard Jones
Red Hat



--
vadim.shender@gmail.com
------=_Part_6155_716187.1214853870683--