* [Caml-list] why is there an Oo.id function?
@ 2002-10-01 17:24 james woodyatt
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: james woodyatt @ 2002-10-01 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The Trade
comrades--
I'm tempted to use the Oo.id function for its intended purpose, but I'm
a little confused about why the function even exists.
What is so special about object values that they need to have a unique
identifier, when all the other distinguished value types don't have
such a quality? I looked through the documentation about interfacing
Caml with C, and I didn't see any indication that the object identifier
is visible in the C interface.
--
j h woodyatt <jhw@wetware.com>
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-10-01 17:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-01 17:24 [Caml-list] why is there an Oo.id function? james woodyatt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).