caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Goldman <alex.gman@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wikipedia
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:24:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9bbd27940511041424y591c3fb4yaae753f6fff1a5d3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1131141215.13512.24.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On 11/4/05, Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 04.11.2005, 13:05 -0800 schrieb Alex Goldman:
> > On 11/4/05, Thomas Fischbacher
> > <Thomas.Fischbacher@physik.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
> >
> > > "most of my links" = "most of the links I set to my own pages".
> > > Wikipedia is not for self-promotion. At least, it *does* smell a bit
> > > strange if there are far more links to ffconsultancy on the Wikipeda
> > > page than to INRIA pages, don't you agree?
> >
> > The title of his user page alone will leave you speechless: Dr. Jon D.
> > Harrop BA MSci PhD. I've never met anyone who used both Dr. and Ph.D.
> > at the same time, and that includes very accomplished people.
>
> Come on, this is not fair.
>
> > Wikipedia has a policy against self-promotion and link spam. The
> > purpose of Wikipedia is to disseminate generally useful and objective
> > encyclopedic knowledge. Instead, Harrop uses it to make
> > self-aggrandizing claims and increase the Google ranking of and
> > traffic to his "company" to sell his book.
>
> This is not fair, too. The links to his own pages can nevertheless be
> objective. Actually, there are lots of scientific sites where very
> well-known authors also sell their books (by including links to Amazon
> etc.).

Do the authors of said scientific sites (Harrop's isn't one of them)
spam Wikipedia with links to their sites, while hiding behind
anonymous IPs (until they are discovered that is)?

The point is, if Harrop doesn't have megalomania, he sure acts like he
does. Look at some earlier versions of the Wikipedia article. He
spammed every section with a blatant link to his "ffconsultancy".

"Uses of Ocaml: 1. Something 2. Visualization {{link to
ffconsultancy}}. (No more uses) "
C'mon, Ocaml is a general purpose language.

He also diluted his spamming with "useful" info that incidentally
betrayed his less than stellar knowledge of the subject in the first
place.

The bad benchmark page is just an ad, really, a pretext to link-spam.

Look at his constant USENET spamming and trolling, if you don't see a
very old pattern here.


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-04 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-03 17:26 Wikipedia Jon Harrop
2005-11-03 19:24 ` [Caml-list] Wikipedia Gerd Stolpmann
2005-11-04  2:31   ` skaller
2005-11-04 13:46     ` [Caml-list] what is high-level (was: Wikipedia) Blue Prawn
2005-11-04 15:13       ` Brian Hurt
2005-11-04 15:28         ` David Teller
2005-11-04 16:02           ` skaller
2005-11-04 16:06           ` [Caml-list] what is high-level Alan Falloon
2005-11-04 16:10             ` William D. Neumann
2005-11-04 16:14             ` David Teller
2005-11-05  0:29             ` skaller
2005-11-05 22:05               ` Michael Walter
2005-11-06 14:28                 ` skaller
2005-11-04 16:50         ` Matt Gushee
2005-11-03 19:30 ` [Caml-list] Wikipedia Kip Macy
2005-11-03 20:46   ` Matt Gushee
2005-11-03 21:08     ` Mike Lin
2005-11-03 21:16 ` Florian Weimer
2005-11-04 17:15 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-11-04 21:05   ` Alex Goldman
2005-11-04 21:53     ` Gerd Stolpmann
2005-11-04 22:24       ` Alex Goldman [this message]
2005-11-06 19:32 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-11-07  6:44   ` Tony Edgin
2005-11-07 12:23     ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-11-07 12:55       ` skaller
2005-11-07 13:03         ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-11-06 20:22 Frederic GAVA
2005-11-06 23:29 ` skaller
2005-11-07 10:14   ` Andreas Rossberg
2005-11-07 12:25     ` skaller
2005-11-07  1:21 ` Thomas Fischbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9bbd27940511041424y591c3fb4yaae753f6fff1a5d3@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=alex.gman@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).