From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C645BCAF for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:30:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j5D8UPb5013684 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:30:25 +0200 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 63so196680wri for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:30:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e6/zuHFECqpcdl1UvkzGloNDqUKtclWcG3q+yJBnrfjr+QSIyIM/bHOrylHgb7rGpbmGySp67ofCz0xsxRXYcoo9fgn0AFCBwIzE+WK1jgGtoAZHo9x/FIVmZZNbqOoHWrHjSQ0mkNFMWJxuZ5IP6u08n0ezARj07uTD65PrjSM= Received: by 10.54.1.39 with SMTP id 39mr139165wra; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.17.36 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e008fda050613013057a4610c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:30:25 +0100 From: Benjamin Geer Reply-To: Benjamin Geer To: Jonathan Roewen Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Pre-emptive multitasking Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050612101323.GA21947@furbychan.cocan.org> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42AD4421.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 thread-safe:01 thread-safe:01 posts:01 multitasking:98 wrote:01 benjamin:01 benjamin:01 caml:02 caml:02 ben:02 xavier:06 group:06 group:06 leroy:07 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On 12/06/05, Jonathan Roewen wrote: > > The GC isn't thread-safe. >=20 > What would it take to make it thread-safe? This has come up before on this list; see these posts by Xavier Leroy: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/fa.caml/msg/acd4b247c3fcb1cd http://groups-beta.google.com/group/fa.caml/msg/ca7279b03517cbc4 Ben