From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16E0B7FCF0 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:23:20 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CwAADkvydVnEpWN0pch0/BV4dPAoF1EgEBAQEBAQERAQEBAQEGDQkJFC6EIAEBAwEjVgULCxoCJgICRxAGG4gaCAS4D5ZaAQEIAQEBAR6BIYoKhEkzB4JoL4EWAQSiGA+NTYQTgzABAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0CwAADkvydVnEpWN0pch0/BV4dPAoF1EgEBAQEBAQERAQEBAQEGDQkJFC6EIAEBAwEjVgULCxoCJgICRxAGG4gaCAS4D5ZaAQEIAQEBAR6BIYoKhEkzB4JoL4EWAQSiGA+NTYQTgzABAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,556,1422918000"; d="scan'208";a="132558516" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2015 14:23:19 +0200 Received: from [172.20.10.2] (207.228.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.197.228.207]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510BA20F8FCD; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:23:03 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: Dario Teixeira Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <2f9c74beafcf41f3ab30324fb1ece739@nleyten.com> <55257AAD.6030004@zoho.com> <5297cdaceccd6db2a60700bf686ccfb7@nleyten.com> <1428576994.22412.21.camel@e130.lan.sumadev.de> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] META file standards for ppx extensions Le jeudi, 9 avril 2015 =C3=A0 14:24, Dario Teixeira a =C3=A9crit : > Below you'll find sample META files for each case. One thing this doesn't seem to answer is where the ppx binary is installed.= Doing a=20=20 > find .opam/4.02.1/lib -name "META" | xargs cat | grep "^ *ppx" On my machine yields the following:=20=20 =20=20 ppx =3D "ppx_lwt" ppx =3D "./ppx_metaquot" ppx(-byte)=3D"./ppx_xtmpl" ppx(byte)=3D"./ppx_xtmpl.byte" which seems inconsistant with the semantics of fields in META files which u= sually express their object w.r.t. to the package directory.=20=20 Best, Daniel