From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q04HCUN3012729 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:32 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,456,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="125588174" Received: from arouen-553-1-246-20.w90-17.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO macadam.home) ([90.17.210.20]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 04 Jan 2012 18:12:31 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Damien Doligez In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:31 +0100 Message-Id: References: To: caml-list X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id q04HCUN3012729 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] "Let"-less syntax for coreML On 2012-01-04, at 14:30, Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons wrote: > Mmm... I didn't request or even suggest a syntax change. I only asked what potential issues it could create. Here is one: as far as I can tell, it cannot be parsed by an LALR(1) parser. -- Damien