From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E8DBC57 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 06:09:22 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuoFAP44BU2TLtdJ/2dsb2JhbACVWo4meMB9hUoEhGKGF4MUGg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,334,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="92076426" Received: from ropas.snu.ac.kr ([147.46.215.73]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2010 06:09:20 +0100 Received: from [147.46.240.98] (unknown [147.46.240.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ropas.snu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2C3EA9E6 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:09:17 +0900 (KST) From: Kihong Heo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: performance of ocamlgraph and ocaml batteries Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:09:17 +0900 Message-Id: To: caml-list@inria.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 graph:01 library:03 let:03 generally:04 batteries:91 batteries:91 curious:09 memory:09 memory:09 maybe:10 beta:12 version:13 version:13 Dear all. I have a big program using ocaml graph and ocaml batteries. When I was improving performance of the program, I was curious about=20 the performance of those library. I use old version of ocaml batteries (maybe beta version?) and the = latest version of ocamlgraph. And I just use PMap and PSet among ocaml batteries.=20 (now those are changed to BatPMap and BatPSet as I know). I want to know=20 1. Is there a big difference in memory consumption between old and new = version of ocaml batteries? 2. Generally, is the memory consumption of ocamlgraph is effective? Please let me know. Best, - Kihong Heo=