From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <joelr1@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA66BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:20:37 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtABABtxuEnRVdypmGdsb2JhbACUej8BAQEBAQgJDAcRrDOBBo8qAQMBA4QKBoMp
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,349,1233529200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="36444891"
Received: from mail-fx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2009 10:20:36 +0100
Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so126687fxm.27
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :subject:date:cc:x-mailer;
        bh=roBhBu4xheluApcF9Ipms8B/+UKilWqCK8Lujh576uc=;
        b=qMZ5VruCMR8axab6ORR8GejHm4tkoF1WptmkoF+gZcX6phtkw0MB5NzDt5n8c+Eu+3
         SMVkHKRHJnagb1MwmeQ1amM1kSp0VFkGHdZ5MG2rNPeG6jqLM6gOo73I3h+eTu9V4wmi
         8JfuIdqwIaPAV+mjZ8lUhHujIwprJW0K9bGSs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:cc:x-mailer;
        b=CFs1BNn4ImvcoOK6QrGUeBVmBngczQhAE0raQ1Dx7U46tm+dvM8Bo2y0gVu6/ujiB6
         Qt7Y0HSJ6lJmx3eFxBwMiFbWx/iQdrmvpgW1lsgaKAvEGAp7FkAcSY01MttwKHTWtZHl
         V7K3z9EXhFSTHwworDQHyvAaKjY7aw+vor0Us=
Received: by 10.103.165.18 with SMTP id s18mr4192770muo.124.1236849636669;
        Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.10.30.7? (127.Red-88-3-8.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.3.8.127])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j10sm757704muh.31.2009.03.12.02.20.35
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20BA0B67-42DD-4E9F-9165-741D91ECCF44@gmail.com> <527cf6bc0903120213k731ee9f5xb6b1104f12f001b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <A902C323-2EFF-4F05-B057-87415E684335@gmail.com>
From: Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
To: blue storm <bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <527cf6bc0903120213k731ee9f5xb6b1104f12f001b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlp4: precedence, LEFTA, NONA, etc.
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:20:23 +0000
Cc: "O'Caml Mailing List" <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 ocaml:01 storm:98 wrote:01 precedence:01 precedence:01 caml-list:01 lefta:02 blue:96 split:08 rules:11 rules:11 reverse:12 possibly:13 should:13 


On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:13 AM, blue storm wrote:

> You should reverse your rules (starting with the
> higher-precendence construnction instead of the atomic values), and
> possibly split some of your level into different levels (eg. "<" and
> "+") for finer-grained precedence.


I have it reversed then as I thought the rules went in increasing  
order of precedence :-(. Thanks for correcting me!

---
http://tinyco.de
Mac, C++, OCaml