From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4A6BC6B for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:09:03 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAD6fr0fAXQImh2dsb2JhbACQOQEBAQgKKZJkg04 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,332,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7152718" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2008 10:09:03 +0100 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m1B993r4003467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:09:03 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAPOfr0fRVYa5nmdsb2JhbACQOQEBAQEBBgQGBwoYkmWDTg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,332,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="9016809" Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.185]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2008 10:09:02 +0100 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so3870641mue.6 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:09:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer:sender; bh=n8GF1AWjsY8urOaSXPuZ+5qLDvFnqdyjiMZyvqTuK38=; b=Gk6GJuChTHDA7GuJZZ5ozyNoUM6v+wbXIk8DM6kZ7Y/5NrXSt7j8zo8nNJu0YK9sFs6k+yvDAxLecr4/Ul6wH9tG7X26CDBFiYtpu7pAc6Xxs/gmZYWpB81Xh+YW4GBDwzcu1w3MMj1tWNQAkKtzwLN1LBEnT4AbrgFBfao0f3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer:sender; b=IcR4lekueb7bdDdBU4R3i87UQ9siK/Vvz19QCR/dxUzqo8Qj7aoHYRbCPemS4AQxZrd7JgVvo4w9xwrwzs9q4qfaO6k6YLw036jovIIsuv9TbrqX+AD3GgThLcVRH9iC5U/npKPGlGHD9WFq2ha9i+HulmOyCPWl57YyrWqhkt4= Received: by 10.78.129.16 with SMTP id b16mr28262495hud.39.1202720941990; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:09:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.58? ( [85.2.91.152]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c9sm39041981nfi.16.2008.02.11.01.09.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:09:01 -0800 (PST) Cc: caml-list List Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=FCnzli_Daniel?= To: David Teller In-Reply-To: <1202717578.6348.13.camel@Blefuscu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:09:07 +0100 References: <1202717578.6348.13.camel@Blefuscu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Sender: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel=20B=FCnzli?= X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 47B010AF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bunzli:01 buenzli:01 yaron:01 caml-list:01 commented:02 slightly:03 suggestion:03 daniel:04 daniel:04 ecrit:06 suggested:07 i'm:09 actually:10 concise:10 agree:12 Le 11 f=E9vr. 08 =E0 09:12, David Teller a =E9crit : > I've re-read the candidate and I have one suggestion: at the moment, =20= > you > want to standardize both `Success and `Error and use `Error to carry > further results. Why not trim-down slightly this recommandation and > standardize only `Success (or the more concise `Ok, as suggested by > Yaron) ? Actually the initial version did exactly this. I changed it because =20 some commented that they wanted a clear case for the error. But if =20 most agree with you I'm willing to change it back. Best, Daniel=