From: "Mattias Waldau" <mattias.waldau@abc.se>
To: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Obsessed by speed
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:51:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AAEBJHFJOIPMMIILCEPBIEBBCLAA.mattias.waldau@abc.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sni5r1c7.fsf@mail.ru>
In the FAQ, I can read an estimation on how expensive different operations
in ocamlopt are.
I have some further questions:
1. If I define Array.iter + a function that uses it,
will ocamlopt combine these two functions two one?
(I looked in the assembler code, but it seemed as
ocamlopt didn't combine them)
2. Do we need special Pentium-4 adaptions to utilize
its very good float performance?
3. Would ocamlopt benefit from a peephole optimizer of
the assembler code? Or is the assembler code already
optimal?
4. What is unboxed and what isn't?
I have noticed that there is a
continuos work to unbox more.
5. How do you make sense of gprof-output? Any suggestions?
--
Mattias Waldau, http://www.abc.se/~m10217/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-21 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-16 11:16 [Caml-list] ocamlopt and Windows DLL Dmitry Bely
2001-05-18 19:51 ` Mattias Waldau [this message]
2001-05-21 16:44 ` [Caml-list] Obsessed by speed Chris Hecker
2001-05-21 19:12 ` William Chesters
2001-05-27 8:47 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-05-31 15:13 ` [Caml-list] report describing optimization of numerical computing of the ocaml compiler Peter Ronnquist
2001-05-31 15:15 ` Peter Ronnquist
2001-05-31 16:12 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-06-01 2:30 ` [Caml-list] report describing optimization of numerical computingof " John Max Skaller
2001-06-01 4:10 ` [Caml-list] report describing optimization of numerical computing of " Tom _
2001-06-01 4:20 ` Niall Dalton
2001-06-01 6:33 ` [Caml-list] SISAL (Was: report describing optimization of numerical computing...) Florian Hars
2001-06-01 22:22 ` Tom _
2001-05-31 15:15 ` [Caml-list] report describing optimization of numerical computing of the ocaml compiler Peter Ronnquist
2001-05-22 17:10 ` [Caml-list] ocamlopt and Windows DLL Dmitry Bely
2001-05-28 14:53 ` Dmitry Bely
2001-05-28 15:29 ` Xavier Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AAEBJHFJOIPMMIILCEPBIEBBCLAA.mattias.waldau@abc.se \
--to=mattias.waldau@abc.se \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).