From: Eray Ozkural <examachine@gmail.com>
To: Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Possible ocamlmpi finalization error?
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 13:31:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=4qY8ES6GFMv0WQ0=r-w0fatr8Rh4Ev1NzdUYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrni8eg43.skq.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1809 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net>wrote:
> On 08-09-2010, Eray Ozkural <examachine@gmail.com> wrote:
> > --===============0522474025==
> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary=0016369204e79d9601048fb8ae36
> >
> > --0016369204e79d9601048fb8ae36
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > I'm recently getting errors that are past MPI_Finalize. Since both
> > init/final and communicator allocation is managed by ocamlmpi, is it
> > possible this is a bug with the library? Have you ever seen something
> like
> > this?
> >
> > Using openmpi on OS X. Here is the log message:
> >
> > *** An error occurred in MPI_Comm_free
> > *** after MPI was finalized
> > *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (goodbye)
> >
> > In the code I'm using both point-to-point and collective communication,
> and
> > as far as I know the code is correct. Could this be due to memory
> > corruption, or should this never happen?
> >
>
> Maybe, you can give a minimal code to reproduce this error?
>
>
Hmm, not really its a complex code but I just ran the debug version in
parallel with exactly the same parameters and there is absolutely no problem
with that. All communication is synchronous so timing cannot be an issue
(since the debug build is naturally slower). AFAICT it's not a memory
problem because no bound errors are reported in the debug build (was it on
by default?). I think it's a lower-level problem than my code. This could
happen if some of that resource allocation is done in different threads, for
instance.
Can you give me any ideas to trace the source of this problem?
Best,
--
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2504 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-08 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-08 5:21 Eray Ozkural
2010-09-08 7:51 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2010-09-08 10:31 ` Eray Ozkural [this message]
2010-09-08 10:58 ` [Caml-list] " Mark Shinwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=4qY8ES6GFMv0WQ0=r-w0fatr8Rh4Ev1NzdUYQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=examachine@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=sylvain@le-gall.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).