On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Wolfgang Draxinger <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:wdraxinger.maillist@draxit.de">wdraxinger.maillist@draxit.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:04:54 +0200<br>
Eray Ozkural &lt;<a href="mailto:examachine@gmail.com">examachine@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; [readworthy text]<br>
<br>
I&#39;d like to point out how the big competitor to OCaml deals with it.<br>
The GHC Haskell system has SMP parallization built in for some time,<br>
and it does it quite well. 
<font color="#888888"></font><br></blockquote><div><br>I think I tested the parallel features just once in the distant past, something like that would be so useful for ocaml :) Explicit threading that is suited to functional programming with a syntax independent of the actual thread implementation. The par combinator looks like fun to use. Wishlist item definitely :)<br>
<br>Cheers,<br> </div></div>-- <br>Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate.  Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara<br><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy</a><br><a href="http://myspace.com/arizanesil">http://myspace.com/arizanesil</a> <a href="http://myspace.com/malfunct">http://myspace.com/malfunct</a><br>
<br>