No, I don't think so.

I think these:
http://csg.csail.mit.edu/pubs/haskell.html
http://csg.csail.mit.edu/projects/languages/ph.shtml

What a cool research group, combines two of my research interests as well :)

Best,

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:29 PM, <orbitz@ezabel.com> wrote:
I believe you are thinking of 'Timber'?



On Jan 7, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Eray Ozkural wrote:

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr> wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I wouldn't classify Erlang as "pure": sending and receiving messages -- which are two of the most important primitives in Erlang -- are definitely side-effects.
Also, asynchronous error-checking, Mnesia, etc. look quite impure to me.

I also vaguely remember Simon Peyton-Jones declaring something along the lines of "The next Haskell will be strict".


There was a strict compiler for Haskell, whatever happened to it? Most times I found it cumbersome to deal with the performance effects of default laziness.

Best,

--
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate.  Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct





--
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate.  Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct