caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eray Ozkural <examachine@gmail.com>
To: Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SMP multithreading
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 02:28:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=tS4EybFRP4pvbeUdncp9yjd7u5TCiGZN7N1aM@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <031301cb869c$8e33f120$aa9bd360$@com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2084 bytes --]

Yes, actually. :P

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Jon Harrop <
jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Can you cite any papers from this century? ;-)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jon.
>
>
>
> *From:* Eray Ozkural [mailto:examachine@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 17 November 2010 13:41
> *To:* Eray Ozkural; Jon Harrop; caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Caml-list] SMP multithreading
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Gabriel Kerneis <kerneis@pps.jussieu.fr>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:27:14AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> > As I said even in C good results can be achieved, I've seen that, so I
> > know it's doable with ocaml, just a difficult kind of compiler. The
> > functional features would expose more concurrency.
>
> Could you share a pointer to a paper describing this compiler?
>
>
> I can't reveal much, but just to point out that there are indeed more
> sophisticated compilers than gcc:
> http://www.research.ibm.com/vliw/compiler.html
>
> So, uh, there are compilers that turn loops into threads, and also
> parallelize independent blocks.... Both coarse-grain and fine-grain
> parallelization strategies in existing compiler research can be effectively
> applied to the multi-core architectures. In fact, some of the more advanced
> compilers (like that of the RAW architecture) must be able to target it
> already, but who knows. :) Just consider that most of the parallelization
> technology is language independent, they can be applied to any imperative
> language. So, would such a thing be able to work on ocaml generated
> binaries? Most definitely, I believe, it is in principle possible to start
> from the sequential binary and emit parallel code!
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> --
> Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate.  Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
> http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct
>



-- 
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate.  Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4643 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-18 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-15 17:27 Wolfgang Draxinger
2010-11-16  6:46 ` [Caml-list] " Edgar Friendly
2010-11-16 17:04   ` Gerd Stolpmann
2010-11-16 20:35     ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-16 22:13       ` Gerd Stolpmann
2010-11-16 23:04         ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-16 23:52           ` Wolfgang Draxinger
2010-11-17  1:55             ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-17  3:41             ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-17  3:47           ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-17  4:27             ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-17  6:50               ` Gabriel Kerneis
2010-11-17 13:41                 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-17 21:15                   ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-18  0:28                     ` Eray Ozkural [this message]
2010-11-18  1:00                       ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-16 19:07   ` Norman Hardy
2010-11-17 16:34   ` David Allsopp
2010-11-19 13:57     ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-16 12:47 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2010-11-17 11:12   ` [Caml-list] " Goswin von Brederlow
2010-11-17 11:34     ` Sylvain Le Gall
2010-11-17 23:08       ` [Caml-list] " Christophe Raffalli
2010-11-19  9:01         ` Christophe TROESTLER
2010-11-19 15:58           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-11-20 11:55             ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-20 20:57               ` Goswin von Brederlow
     [not found] ` <AANLkTinyN2hHxm6ha2Yq4nx6NxY3So=BhFN_-EHKYfyc@mail.gmail.com>
2010-11-16 14:11   ` Wolfgang Draxinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTi=tS4EybFRP4pvbeUdncp9yjd7u5TCiGZN7N1aM@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=examachine@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).