From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <p.donadeo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A544BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:02:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AucAAH0QyUzRVaC0k2dsb2JhbACDDJ41CBUBAQEBCQkKCREDH6N0iR08gheGGS6IVwEBAwWBHYMydASKUw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,252,1286143200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="76698763"
Received: from mail-gy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.160.180])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2010 15:02:24 +0200
Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so1172851gyg.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=SXd6FuPo/Umh2CH7wkxlKT1Mo8Jb6ujrIgdVj0QBjQA=;
        b=AsYg4BRMBR+vE1YHgwTy429ial3V+qCOnuvgm0ZnX2KiKwD16oDiM/uBHm8RsJ9Cej
         YDuan9uzcn/kD6Gee4t4hmFcwiNz8faPV9J9czjp2acfoPNNNar2cLedHy9ukivcSee7
         NeKlBzML4md71JidH//vF1ElN4X6D2wkY4NgU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=UgE4EuoYbo1HQU7F0xeqKrKYSV27qUac49atu9ZHgIsVBHqZNlCyqttffR+c2lDEjR
         LmCaxnTsXNCEuMIFS1iPk9LTLwGEbg5nCIt2AGgmF+NvY/AapDGpNHmQ3FPcQqAt7sE1
         Ow9fjpNmQ3xZ2rvqw6Ke4l50jeEdQG6qz4ivQ=
Received: by 10.42.223.193 with SMTP id il1mr2711942icb.411.1288270943569;
 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.83.208 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20101028121810.GA32597@securactive.net>
References: <20101028121810.GA32597@securactive.net>
From: Paolo Donadeo <p.donadeo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:02:03 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikocz_RMsGHhqDQ6PYGJ+rJDDATChukseYbLJHH@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Thread.delay to raise EINTR exception ?
To: OCaml mailing list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam: no; 0.00; eintr:01 exception:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 raise:03 cee:05 inria:06 thread:06 discussion:06 some:14 2010:83 pitfall:19 months:76 it's:23 

It's a known pitfall. Read this discussion of some months ago:

http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2010/08/242cee79bb97e86bc93bc6bd88d2f256.en.html


-- 
Paolo