From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <raould@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FBEBC57
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 14 May 2010 20:11:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AncDABYv7UtKfVI0gGdsb2JhbACddggVAQEUJCKuD4IAhQUuiE0BAQMFgluCMASDQA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,232,1272837600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="50635609"
Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 May 2010 20:11:37 +0200
Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so1835342wwb.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 14 May 2010 11:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=f3panBs8xqiazrsy4XLa4J6nYajy0cmoCMxLqtWRoAY=;
        b=xrXExYCoAQPU7Ss10YDdds+hEFpAikCU5MNx2v1l595CEDaHdSsau7755jaUXT5AW8
         nlUQzX8ZtyJuFdPJ1LQVGaIBQrsYUXwtxPUTL2hqmUrus0o0KAk3AmJAUfmSPyuvzwah
         4eaAqpbGtsVwC+ONw+I2YPafPYucI2/LT8U3A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=FLlvaD3qZZCtuCyHeQEzcnMCf2cZKXRNWoFC7irouW10mAoqoBkq46o7ZCNxN0qKss
         v9+wPXyPWTGDxDjLW1D7oLOJVAJ4PeQnz5DOyDSwb/xaXVbK+NiLZRpOtIgtauxUYy4b
         0/N8sOWo/4ap9Grqe2Tqp3j9P5qbmoMN+yMdw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.91.80 with SMTP id g58mr1065621wef.181.1273860697306; Fri, 
	14 May 2010 11:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.11.139 with HTTP; Fri, 14 May 2010 11:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimi-r33ze7oyRr2mu29kxUUs997lnHwKTXaUBjN@mail.gmail.com>
References: <w2t320e992a1005051158pcdb30e5w48409aa8b6e464e4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <g2j90823c941005060343t88c91d06k731ccd01ec225c07@mail.gmail.com>
	 <201005061233.07551.peng.zang@gmail.com>
	 <07b101caf08b$3e5022c0$baf06840$@com>
	 <AANLkTik7gzvUrLntCLbL7gQow4RCzkXDPwCNiCHIE6Or@mail.gmail.com>
	 <088201caf1ce$b5060cb0$1f122610$@com>
	 <20100512151137.26894ywcpv71ixvk@imp.ovh.net>
	 <012601caf351$e9a362e0$bcea28a0$@com>
	 <87fx1uh5r5.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
	 <AANLkTimi-r33ze7oyRr2mu29kxUUs997lnHwKTXaUBjN@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:11:37 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTilevqlmv-4FuDypPUX0zavErBkOd_N-7OusYxoY@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL
From: Raoul Duke <raould@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ecosystem:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 apps:04 fri:05 comparable:06 linux:07 linux:07 technically:09 closed:10 well-defined:10 jvm:11 interesting:12 doesn't:12 constrained:12 

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:26 AM, ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com> wrote:
> realworld. I think it's interesting that on the ms-windows platform
> .net is used for everything with great success:
> Compared to that I think the jvm is only succesful when it comes to
> 'backend services', which often play an important role in big and
> often technically conservative companies.
> I think it's safe to say that on the linux platform we have NOTHING
> COMPARABLE to .NET when it comes to DESKTOP and WEB apps. Why can't
> java doesn't fill this gap?

ms windows is a more closed and constrained and well-defined ecosystem
than linux is. i think that has impact on the situation.

sincerely.