From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <raould@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93995BC57
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:42:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4GAEpg7UtKfVK0gGdsb2JhbACSBot4CBUBARQkIq1fggCEcy6ITQEBAwWFCwSDQA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,233,1272837600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="62845895"
Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 May 2010 23:42:43 +0200
Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so488909wyb.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 14 May 2010 14:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=YxNoRWporS1v0LSqOGvBrc0BKstKHFfGWKRZL/rpLlU=;
        b=BEYuMrO3JE/2nU8Lql00efvToV1Fy8n7IlMDM97QgkitpJeeD7qGNza9pLPNWjOwLY
         DuXolb2QopUfm1strtutSyI786AfbX2vKIQb9MnFRKPKdyQXZ6MHUUb/toalsLTqgHnK
         BRk63lBN23e+XksoAZs/VG1h+cY+FizYeZ0jU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=NN0oh+HJSjTG/L8AXJqY55mQNlB0gHq+PAzY3LZvarHftU7HWCtmggBBgh5xStUOrr
         ExrgnduV6Q7FspHCVdMPVzx9xOI3jatLtSAA/3vQULfSzNx1Qzav/YVNnpZVDvkHoMza
         MTVBaltxTJUx24Yo+Kqe+EPRlTKrmtezULPV8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.186.194 with SMTP id w44mr1222773wem.186.1273873362527; 
	Fri, 14 May 2010 14:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.11.139 with HTTP; Fri, 14 May 2010 14:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik-EuZRmX8VKMdAIsO_t8JGHvS6F9TPVLkohed8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <w2t320e992a1005051158pcdb30e5w48409aa8b6e464e4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <AANLkTik7gzvUrLntCLbL7gQow4RCzkXDPwCNiCHIE6Or@mail.gmail.com>
	 <088201caf1ce$b5060cb0$1f122610$@com>
	 <20100512151137.26894ywcpv71ixvk@imp.ovh.net>
	 <012601caf351$e9a362e0$bcea28a0$@com>
	 <87fx1uh5r5.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
	 <AANLkTimi-r33ze7oyRr2mu29kxUUs997lnHwKTXaUBjN@mail.gmail.com>
	 <AANLkTilevqlmv-4FuDypPUX0zavErBkOd_N-7OusYxoY@mail.gmail.com>
	 <AANLkTimUajuA3nWuamWNv9v8N2-1syU3S4ltj4Gt0exj@mail.gmail.com>
	 <AANLkTik-EuZRmX8VKMdAIsO_t8JGHvS6F9TPVLkohed8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:42:42 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTilfCK7lSw-aXl2vgH6WJETU-UbK4UGN8GkshcmF@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: [Caml-list] about OcamIL
From: Raoul Duke <raould@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam: no; 0.00; bytecode:01 ecosystem:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 fri:05 fri:05 somewhere:06 long:06 ported:07 complexity:09 environment:10 execution:11 doesn't:12 matters:13 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Raoul Duke <raould@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL
To: ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com>


On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM, ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com> wrote:
> but that would be the big benefit of a clr like vm: It doesn't matter
> how messed up, chaotic or just heterogen the environment is as long as
> you can count on a regular execution of your portable bytecode.

of course it matters: there must be the resources to get the vm ported
across all the fubar variations of the ecosystem. the combinatorics
has to be dealt with somewhere. that kind of complexity is less in the
hegemonic windows os world, i hypothesize.

sincerely.