From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A182BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri,  2 Jul 2010 10:27:40 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj0CADo/LUzRVaE0mGdsb2JhbACDHJxHCBUBAQEBAQgJDAcRIqxpgkaFP4kBAQEDBYElgwlyBIgzhyU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,525,1272837600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="65732600"
Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2010 10:27:39 +0200
Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so2441451fxm.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=auFSDKjkLDOKgM2A0KE07cuLOKA6TJPJsKDi+eBZa/8=;
        b=meAfKIInO63wj4cgOvf2O1pF5fh+vUSa4UswklVIx38zNU9SkBDcVQ7qjeLcN3oxlX
         PtDlJbLct6rHANOb6gyw/fIMqreJdIFNlJar03AEswKzPqT7Pi32DAYT56HgUv+uf1ui
         mpDBIdLFvMSb449O5eq73z98kKOb0tlAUk34E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=f9+FeseCuit89x5yB8U5afhUckkSNoULuxaxANpGQ7QtjtuETNx2NOEoo/RjHbgJnW
         H5sVfSO/8JKC6JN7LxaoyMiHfVnTqzY/XKuuv+h1rQOTS6anGTcGU3KzOpn7J56bEXC8
         iqZkDrirRjJOAvGCezaNGiK2Nd85KUez3Nb8Y=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.126.199 with SMTP id d7mr327917fas.102.1278059258585; Fri, 
	02 Jul 2010 01:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.109.198 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C2D9E51.8010500@frisch.fr>
References: <AANLkTilISu1bWwWj305NhqJTTuFuIUOTF8d5RoNF9Csp@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimxje_P_RRRGCUkG2Z037tIuAsFruzLLMv8fDlq@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C2D9E51.8010500@frisch.fr>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:27:38 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: YPZre0h8iZRQjZTsZiE-SQaD4Ok
Message-ID: <AANLkTilwwVwg60YhyGZOia8JOwkFljZW_bgM9a327oBx@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Dynlinking plugins defining the same unit name 
	but with different implementations.
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr>
Cc: caml-list List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam: no; 0.00; buenzli:01 dynlink:01 caml-list:01 modules:02 defining:02 unit:03 daniel:04 daniel:04 loading:05 beta:12 mode:13 should:13 but:14 plugins:14 same:17 

> (Note: for dynlink, I believe that loading modules in private mode should be safe.)

No, at least not in 3.12.0+beta1.

Daniel