From: Eray Ozkural <examachine@gmail.com>
To: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
Cc: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com>, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SMP multithreading
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:35:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim2r0S7ZSmXFK87-u2PKRqvyuiBkH5rQfp7ju_C@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289927042.16005.176.camel@thinkpad>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1023 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>wrote:
> Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 22:46 -0800 schrieb Edgar Friendly:
> * As somebody mentioned "implicit parallelization": Don't expect
> anything from this. Even if a good compiler finds ways to
> parallelize 20% of the code (which would be a lot), the runtime
> effect would be marginal. 80% of the code is run at normal speed
> (hopefully) and dominates the runtime behavior. The point is
> that such compiler-driven code improvements are only local
> optimizations. For getting good parallelization results you need
> to restructure the design of the program - well, maybe
> compiler2.0 can do this at some time, but this is not in sight.
>
I think you are underestimating parallelizing compilers.
--
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1535 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-16 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-15 17:27 Wolfgang Draxinger
2010-11-16 6:46 ` [Caml-list] " Edgar Friendly
2010-11-16 17:04 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2010-11-16 20:35 ` Eray Ozkural [this message]
2010-11-16 22:13 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2010-11-16 23:04 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-16 23:52 ` Wolfgang Draxinger
2010-11-17 1:55 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-17 3:41 ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-17 3:47 ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-17 4:27 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-17 6:50 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2010-11-17 13:41 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-17 21:15 ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-18 0:28 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-18 1:00 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-16 19:07 ` Norman Hardy
2010-11-17 16:34 ` David Allsopp
2010-11-19 13:57 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-11-16 12:47 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2010-11-17 11:12 ` [Caml-list] " Goswin von Brederlow
2010-11-17 11:34 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2010-11-17 23:08 ` [Caml-list] " Christophe Raffalli
2010-11-19 9:01 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2010-11-19 15:58 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-11-20 11:55 ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-20 20:57 ` Goswin von Brederlow
[not found] ` <AANLkTinyN2hHxm6ha2Yq4nx6NxY3So=BhFN_-EHKYfyc@mail.gmail.com>
2010-11-16 14:11 ` Wolfgang Draxinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTim2r0S7ZSmXFK87-u2PKRqvyuiBkH5rQfp7ju_C@mail.gmail.com \
--to=examachine@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
--cc=thelema314@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).