From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lukstafi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4B3BC59
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:05:31 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am8BACNLk0zRVdg2kGdsb2JhbACUN41nCBUBAQEBCQkMBxEDH6k7iTyCFIZxLYhLAQEDBYISgykEijM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,383,1280700000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="69696357"
Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com ([209.85.216.54])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2010 20:05:25 +0200
Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so2945136qwg.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=AM/N2EZ5lfXTjoD9nmZwTxIADLP6hIu6WnsUEEPC7Fw=;
        b=aMEe1BPCuLndF1fzFKwMUNySqDnPCC8LMFg09ZU4XmNgtllkJIAkomcIMYx4WvOYEd
         4CIdQwVzvvJK7ip9Y89TU5Xt4DuppKh92Bpk99BSgktMniRuLyMxkO30f4Zuz05G9w3l
         9eapyV0mPfghZ4Y/bKNa0/mWTWj0A4gtACk/w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=HnQmcrfISN8KvYsEhb7sIVPhz3VPYbIEZC+QUJPWIpBD9qzhisYKpg71sXqHjt6lAp
         S5C+8oWIknIdX3pMOA/i8nDe1cMpl1F4CcKdldNDPIUGDOAR57x2i1u8Zcy2KKDJtaRe
         iw9R8mZ/V6TsYff1+qRariTEKAYrAMXo4wqNM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.220.11 with SMTP id hw11mr3719733qcb.218.1284746724896;
 Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.185.78 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20100302103031.4436317468@Adric.ern.nps.edu>
References: <20100302103031.4436317468@Adric.ern.nps.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:05:24 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimLq9JZ2H1ahSrPaR5OrUFxk=8fjSuf2m4SCsUk@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MetaOCaml-Hackers] MetaOCaml lives!
From: Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@gmail.com>
To: oleg@okmij.org
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr, metaocaml-hackers-l@mailman.rice.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam: no; 0.00; metaocaml:01 lukasz:01 native-code:01 metaocaml:01 oleg:01 byte-code:01 ocaml:01 byte-code:01 compilation:01 cross-stage:01 ber:98 ber:98 wrote:01 native:03 tue:06 

Hi,

Forgive me if it's rude to ask, but how is work on native-code BER
MetaOCaml going?

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:30 PM,  <oleg@okmij.org> wrote:
>
> This is to announce BER MetaOCaml, a streamlined version of
> MetaOCaml. [...] BER MetaOCaml is current with the
> byte-code OCaml release 3.11.2.

[...]

> Currently BER MetaOCaml is restricted to byte-code. Support for the
> native code compilation is of high priority. However, better ways of
> handling cross-stage persistent values have to be investigated first.