From: David House <dmhouse@gmail.com>
To: Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva <tolkiendili@gmail.com>
Cc: ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] what do I need to know to understand camlp4
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:35:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin0JyYTJ_WLk2x27RQU7JNEAXvwDkO8OQzM-Pw9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=7TRCwxgRSPTOCN-1E0-KsWHzquLAoDhVaWAcb@mail.gmail.com>
On 24 September 2010 01:15, Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva
<tolkiendili@gmail.com> wrote:
> [1] Pervasives should define it. In fact, even though ** is
> right-associative, it looks like any user-defined operator is
> left-associative by default. So it works like Haskell:
>
> # let ($) a b = a b;;
> val ( $ ) : ('a -> 'b) -> 'a -> 'b = <fun>
> # fun x y z -> x $ y $ z;;
> - : ('a -> 'b -> 'c) -> 'a -> 'b -> 'c = <fun>
> # let q = fun x y z -> x $ y $ z;;
> val q : ('a -> 'b -> 'c) -> 'a -> 'b -> 'c = <fun>
> # let q' = fun x y z -> (x $ y) $ z;;
> val q' : ('a -> 'b -> 'c) -> 'a -> 'b -> 'c = <fun>
> # let q'' = fun x y z -> x $ (y $ z);;
> val q'' : ('a -> 'b) -> ('c -> 'a) -> 'c -> 'b = <fun>
> # let q''' = fun x y z -> x $ y z;;
> val q''' : ('a -> 'b) -> ('c -> 'a) -> 'c -> 'b = <fun>
Incidentally, ($) in Haskell is right-associative; however the
consensus in the Haskell community (in my experience) is that this is
a mistake. If it were left-associative, you would lose the ability to
say f $ g $ x, but this can be written f . g $ x anyway (dot is
function composition (a -> b) -> (b -> c) -> a -> c, and does
right-associate), but many things would require fewer parentheses,
e.g. f (g x) (h y) can be written f $ g x $ h y.
In fact, the strict function application operator ($!) *is* left-associative.
See http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/ChangeDollarAssociativity
for more information.
Also, you say "Pervasives should define it" -- the important thing
about dollar in Haskell is that it has very low precedence, hence its
ability to save parentheses. I didn't think OCaml allowed us to
specify the operator precedence of the infix operators we define.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-24 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-23 14:56 ben kuin
2010-09-23 15:21 ` [Caml-list] " David MENTRE
2010-09-23 19:50 ` ben kuin
2010-09-24 0:15 ` Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva
2010-09-24 7:35 ` David House [this message]
2010-09-27 11:43 ` Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva
2010-09-24 7:48 ` David MENTRE
2010-09-23 15:25 ` bluestorm
2010-09-23 16:23 ` Jake Donham
2010-09-23 18:49 ` ben kuin
2010-09-23 18:54 ` Jake Donham
2010-09-23 19:06 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-09-23 16:28 ` Michael Ekstrand
2010-09-23 16:35 ` Sylvain Le Gall
[not found] ` <1285259219.1820.15.camel@knine>
2010-09-23 18:43 ` [Caml-list] " ben kuin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTin0JyYTJ_WLk2x27RQU7JNEAXvwDkO8OQzM-Pw9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmhouse@gmail.com \
--cc=benkuin@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=tolkiendili@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).