20 full time programmers, but if each of them has 1/40 of the skills of 
X. Leroy, LLVM will get only 50% of the caml native compiler 
performance.<br>
I&#39;m not sure hype is correlated with value as you seem to imply but i might be wrong.<br><br>This was the troll of the day.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Jon Harrop <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com">jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Erik wrote:<br>
&gt; Jon wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; LLVM is also much better documented than ocamlopt&#39;s internals.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; LLVM has well over 20 full time programmers working on it. The<br>
&gt; Ocaml compiler has how many?<br>
<br>
Another reason why LLVM deserves its hype.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Jon.<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:<br>
<a href="http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list" target="_blank">http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list</a><br>
Archives: <a href="http://caml.inria.fr" target="_blank">http://caml.inria.fr</a><br>
Beginner&#39;s list: <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners</a><br>
Bug reports: <a href="http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs" target="_blank">http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>