From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C246FBBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:05:09 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au0AAO+IEE3RVdg0kGdsb2JhbACVcI4RCBYBAQEJCQwHEQQgpnCJdIIYhVIuiFcBAQMFhUQEiwKJPA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,208,1291590000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="83319372"
Received: from mail-qw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2010 20:05:09 +0100
Received: by qwi4 with SMTP id 4so4044913qwi.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:05:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received
         :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=dMlgwJkiL/ps0h63cPFUnK41fP9Sf8kY4BnlB3pr+0w=;
        b=ljYqIfVtCpzk+EfLnJx/KpBZQ8iZ4foJNwZJfNm7NzGfU2ugWd3po3qyzGOcd35+5s
         ky0PLVzQmZVtk9DmuTGEnvOMEPPNGb+9wHZX5rC5gGRQ6FJlVSyG2z39J1txg5c9EcwK
         8QssqVoEHoEYCgz8IFYFWjqN2vRcTDJknodBs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        b=bJ5aSqahs++LDIfYvCQpYwxjPQs3ql5Pbo+ASj0nFZ8AXiJfmFWnJxE5q50E8yWT58
         c/Su8mYVu5sXPEekBXrjD9tM1VyR8Scwf1YGDj8bZ6qkXPi1LWkZU29O+al7R+mCklzf
         thcim7qHod/JDX77nK1VOpOrJ54lOmRL/IQ+U=
Received: by 10.229.220.78 with SMTP id hx14mr5272814qcb.46.1292958308482;
 Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:05:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gabriel.scherer@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.23.139 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:04:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BD504BC1-F16D-490A-AAAF-15ADC93888E0@ezabel.com>
References: <BD504BC1-F16D-490A-AAAF-15ADC93888E0@ezabel.com>
From: bluestorm <bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:04:48 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: o2ipEy1z0Uj_Mm8EWvJwm-tv_zo
Message-ID: <AANLkTinfvJ4fZhEXdfkcMRmeA80ww6aiwqRBifYaY41y@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Lwt and Tuareg mode
To: orbitz@ezabel.com
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016361e7f1cafc3290497f050a8
X-Spam: no; 0.00; tuareg:01 emacs:01 camlp:01 ocaml:01 hand-written:01 camlp:01 emacs:01 ocaml:01 hand-written:01 parsing:01 parsing:01 caml-list:01 arbitrary:02 arbitrary:02 indentation:04 

--0016361e7f1cafc3290497f050a8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

What would really be interesting is an emacs mode that use camlp4 for
parsing and indentation of OCaml code, instead of hand-written regexes. It
is much more complicated, but would scale to arbitrary camlp4 extensions.

--0016361e7f1cafc3290497f050a8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

What would really be interesting is an emacs mode that use camlp4 for parsing and indentation of OCaml code, instead of hand-written regexes. It is much more complicated, but would scale to arbitrary camlp4 extensions.

--0016361e7f1cafc3290497f050a8--