From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7A9BBAF for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:33:06 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhADALyG7EzRVaC2kGdsb2JhbACUPYYpAYgFCBUBAQIJCQwHEQMfoy2JZIIYhSUuiFYBAQMFhUIEimCLGQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,247,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="80110908" Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com ([209.85.160.182]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2010 12:33:05 +0100 Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so14890203gyf.27 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 03:33:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=otRFlke7u3Hdl/gEghxwfWfiidPmTbYPhkOxzG3Jjg8=; b=UDSrU0O16F62HmujH01GywVTUrXVxRPVERy8S5cOGSmoJ9CuqhHJWr2B0bmDN+4vJM sPyMFNLXbnRGqHqd6Upl1Bq9BRHf2fCJIMn6JVsYpxFGtEppEDn49F2KiU39dEj16nl3 A1nWRTs3UMwakWIea/vIl995dapQc3PAtlmp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ftD4aVH01nCyDpwqM8DOSKiTjX8rTz68Us4O0EjNuIoLMRHQx/mimRgA12Jmz//ubK 9MLZiRrJZpAfSb5yNENTJITJORgNu77KYGtxixVyPsGsA70ztoJeYqBxxbDtVUky3VrH 8jtGVlRGaRjy5QMCyhokxazSRFaNu7/5Vs/Ng= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.227.2 with SMTP id z2mr690467agg.32.1290598384886; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 03:33:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.91.154.3 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 03:33:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101124.112433.2237591808641262985.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umons.ac.be> References: <20101124.112433.2237591808641262985.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umons.ac.be> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:33:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? From: Eray Ozkural To: Christophe Troestler Cc: igouy2@yahoo.com, caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630fd87476e2b0495cadaf3 X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 eray:01 ozkural:01 christophe:01 troestler:01 christophe:01 troestler:01 ocaml:01 eray:01 ozkural:01 bilkent:01 bilkent:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 --00163630fd87476e2b0495cadaf3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Christophe Troestler < Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umh.ac.be > wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:50:15 +0000, Isaac Gouy wrote: > > > > Jeff Meister gmail.com> writes: > > > > > We know what your rules are for binary-trees; repeating them does > > > not help. > > > > When Christophe TROESTLER wrongly states - "OCaml is not authorized > > to make use of its very own library!" - he shows that those rules > > are not known. > > Isolating a sentence gives a misleading idea of what I said. Must I > really repeat that I was asking WHY is C allowed to use an external > library to enhance its memory management=B9 but OCaml cannot use its own > library to do that. I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a > JUSTIFICATION for them (which you have been incapable of providing so > far). > > I didn't get it, either. Best, --=20 Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct --00163630fd87476e2b0495cadaf3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Christophe Troestler &l= t;Christophe.Troe= stler+ocaml@umh.ac.be> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border= -left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:50:15 +0000, Isaac Gouy wrote:
>
> Jeff Meister <nanaki <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > We know what your rules are for binary-trees; repeating them does=
> > not help.
>
> When Christophe TROESTLER wrongly states - "OCaml is not authoriz= ed
> to make use of its very own library!" - he shows that those rules=
> are not known.

Isolating a sentence gives a misleading idea of what I said. =A0Must = I
really repeat that I was asking WHY is C allowed to use an external
library to enhance its memory management=B9 but OCaml cannot use its own library to do that. =A0I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a
JUSTIFICATION for them (which you have been incapable of providing so
far).
=A0


I didn't get it, either.
=
Best,

--
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate.=A0 Comp.= Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
http://myspace.com/arizanesil= http://myspace.com/malfunct
--00163630fd87476e2b0495cadaf3--