From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA28758; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:50:00 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA28223 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:49:59 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from wetware.com (wetware.wetware.com [199.108.16.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6THnwEV027828 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:49:59 +0200 Received: from [208.177.152.17] (helo=[10.0.1.9]) by wetware.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BqF2U-0007Zv-3T; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:49:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ocaml Trade From: james woodyatt Subject: Re: [Caml-list] looping recursion Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:49:56 -0700 To: Brian Hurt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 410938C6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; woodyatt:01 jhw:01 wetware:01 caml-list:01 recursion:01 brogoff:01 catenable:01 deques:01 extlib:01 simplistic:01 deques:01 catenable:01 extlib:01 complexity:02 purely:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On 29 Jul 2004, at 09:12, Brian Hurt wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, brogoff wrote: >> >> Some problems are just way easier to solve with imperative programming >> though. Have you ever taken a look at purely functional catenable >> deques? > > Just got added to extlib, for the record. A simplistic version that > actually isn't that much more complicated than the imperitive > implementation. This is extraordinary! Do you really mean to say the deques are purely functional, catenable *and* offering the same complexity as the non-persistent implementation? Which algorithm was added to extlib? ― ∴ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners