From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A107EE80
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:47:03 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuEBAKulTFFKN1ZKkWdsb2JhbABDhRGDHL0ogXsOAQEBAQkLEhQogiUBBSNmCxoCJgICRxAhiAwEsAmSHIEjjTw6FoIXMmEDnE8TjhE
X-IPAS-Result: AuEBAKulTFFKN1ZKkWdsb2JhbABDhRGDHL0ogXsOAQEBAQkLEhQogiUBBSNmCxoCJgICRxAhiAwEsAmSHIEjjTw6FoIXMmEDnE8TjhE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,893,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="8894786"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2013 19:47:02 +0100
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (81-235.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.235.81])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7B720AA117
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:46:58 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:46:54 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <B5CAD7A0A8934F90B7A8ACAC8FEB7F9D@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <01a501ce2725$f3e530c0$dbaf9240$@ffconsultancy.com>
References: <fa.e3jKyg6bl9+vTkPgypQ4ZRzEoos@ifi.uio.no>
 <878v5lca2c.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com>
 <CAGmVoG15XvxWb9SEkV_uj3v7SwB4r9W0K9=8UDPVEEGghkDBoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <9813208.KJBpLPkkvX@groupon>
 <069c01ce25ab$a9cf3f10$fd6dbd30$@ffconsultancy.com>
 <CACLX4jTuV-M5HYDgbJdE9H5EC_FbCfy5uw4CvpKUTk5cJw=VdA@mail.gmail.com>
 <06b901ce25ca$cc415be0$64c413a0$@ffconsultancy.com>
 <514B81CB.3070103@etorok.net>
 <01a501ce2725$f3e530c0$dbaf9240$@ffconsultancy.com>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Haskell vs OCaml

Le vendredi, 22 mars 2013 =C3=A0 18:51, Jon Harrop a =C3=A9crit :
> No but I suspect it was related to OpenGL and I doubt it would affect
> standalone OCaml applications.


This seems to contradict :

Le jeudi, 21 mars 2013 =C3=A0 01:26, Jon Harrop a =C3=A9crit :
> We were forced to drop Presenta when we found that around 80% of beta tes=
ters
> experienced segmentation faults even though it was 100% pure OCaml code.

=20=20


Daniel