From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64528BB81 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:56:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.44]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k1MIu9C8026389 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:56:10 +0100 Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout12/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1MIu854029548 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:56:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.206.24.233] (a17-206-24-233.apple.com [17.206.24.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1MIu71A013196 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:56:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <43FCAEDF.6090404@grayskies.net> References: <20060222091303.1D408BBE1@yquem.inria.fr> <43FCAEDF.6090404@grayskies.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Reply-To: j h woodyatt Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: James Woodyatt Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml on OS X intel platform Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:56:06 -0800 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43FCB3C9.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; woodyatt:01 caml-list:01 ocaml:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 cross-:01 compilers:01 binary:01 woodyatt:01 jhw:01 wrote:01 native:02 output:02 long:05 problem:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Feb 22, 2006, at 10:35 AM, David Powers wrote: > > That would work if you had both the PPC and Intel versions on hand =20 > - can the compiler be induced to output both of those on the same =20 > machine? I have long mused about the possibility of having native OCaml cross-=20 compilers (I work on embedded software). The Mac OS X universal =20 binary problem is a special case of the more general problem I'm to =20 which I'm adding my voice for the wishing of a solution. =97 j h woodyatt