From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA05378; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:19:17 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA05201 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:19:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from inria.fr (macaque.inria.fr [128.93.8.158]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id hB3EJFr11112 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:19:15 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:19:37 +0100 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] getting stack traces in running code Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) From: Damien Doligez To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <000201c3b94d$11646b80$0274a8c0@PWARP> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 damien:01 damien:01 cannasse:01 backtrace:01 stub:01 camlexport:01 camlprim:01 backtrace:01 camlprim:01 val:01 caml:01 nicolas:01 doligez:01 doligez:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wednesday, December 3, 2003, at 04:19 AM, Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > BTW, if the "print_exception_backtrace" of the caml sources was > exported as > Primitive, we would be able to do it without the need of any C stub : > the > other way to do it is then to run a modified interpreter where > CAMLexport > have been replaced with CAMLprim in backtrace.c.... Don't do that. print_exception_backtrace returns void, but a CAMLprim must return a value. You'll have to make it return Val_unit. -- Damien ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners