From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p459vUGB013535
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:57:30 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQCAMhzwk1KfVK2kGdsb2JhbACYKI4FCBQBAQEBCQkNBxQEIakbjBiCLoUnNIheAQEDBoYBBIlUhXaKYzuDMw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,318,1301868000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="98782818"
Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 05 May 2011 11:57:26 +0200
Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so2700455wyf.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=1ZaYD9P1Ck3b2RfP2vYU6bV40rHoFmp8n/NjuwxvUlo=;
        b=XSCJ/KGO4LX+4aRxqsO3v0cbgnKBXym+W90HtUc+MST4tGD4wUbKOEvkCw3RU320cu
         1mL/o/p8ye440K/OLXOCJ1rkoZ/4lxFHJMwbYtQQpR2v00kVnfKtg5Cj0CG/kIJl9ytU
         5++28w1x0WqNxnBIS8GtdTg4+Mpl+V04WrIB0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=Q5fLB8fQIeWx0FNVmNZSecff501hjJdiMam6fzX6SFhTo4Qj9sW/DdGTynuahPe5wE
         Riy1RsIW4Kk8gov80m1lq+qEMj3vhwoZhhWslsI0Ah5op7oTxrr0k1Vzg7DWpqPMHyhG
         QSsWawClchAWfXMFDEbh6YMBedI0OntVJAoD0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.184.66 with SMTP id cj2mr1019613wbb.90.1304589445798; Thu,
 05 May 2011 02:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.147.148 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2011 02:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: david.baelde@ens-lyon.org
In-Reply-To: <201105021848.45284.monnier.florent@gmail.com>
References: <fa.6Y/ymCKnZgZmswumjjdnkchP1wI@ifi.uio.no>
	<BANLkTinLGk9mArx83R0gNjKRpv6eg9YLaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<85360856-DA1E-48C8-B449-BD03EAA4F154@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
	<201105021848.45284.monnier.florent@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:57:25 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTiksMV_=yh8ihvd9LTw6=0pwEc+Jyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Baelde <david.baelde@gmail.com>
To: Florent Monnier <monnier.florent@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Pros and cons of different GL bindings ?

Hi Florent,

This is perhaps a naive remark, but it sounds like bigarrays would
make sense here, providing structure on the caml side while keeping a
flat layout on the C side.

Cheers,

David