From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5ULbFaI027506 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:37:16 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsBAN3rDE7RVaC2kGdsb2JhbAA8AQMSmDiPHAgUAQEBAQkJDQcUBCGrT4wggkuEKDmIaAIDBoYrBJIviUWCVzyDcg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,454,1304287200"; d="scan'208";a="102302563" Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com ([209.85.160.182]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 30 Jun 2011 23:37:11 +0200 Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so1665528gyf.27 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:37:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g46gO3/bYZwizMqrHx0ylDkZcc8RlK6pGtsJa/KVJYc=; b=UQ/dTHS+jDZ91/FE+OooUEyAdz0QzdSzwYmi7gesp7j3k5EqKvz0RnkQ3WvtSp3F7d GqXroPpdNaBeAE1JdsOovKnoeZuGlmtwTcI6bGB3tXqZFF215bObVhx3AltTXWwaZfur 0i6rlKHaKYcQWhse6hy7g2fzT+fMnuh9Ksq8g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.173.196 with SMTP id v44mr3302223yhl.3.1309469830454; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.207.194 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:37:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <02C8A868-5575-4181-9FDC-29F1CC2F6822@inria.fr> References: <0EC5BE6E-FBB1-4B89-8362-5F9005AE7B84@inria.fr> <305A0394-9E08-4347-8320-BB5F5EFAF363@gmail.com> <4E085B9B.1020502@glondu.net> <4AEC4555-7685-4156-AEAE-062B64803556@inria.fr> <02C8A868-5575-4181-9FDC-29F1CC2F6822@inria.fr> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:37:09 -0400 Message-ID: From: Markus Mottl To: Damien Doligez Cc: caml users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id p5ULbFaI027506 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml 3.12.1 compatibility report I have uploaded a new version of bin-prot to my website, which should fix the problem. I haven't actually tested it with OCaml 3.12.1, but am quite confident it will work. Please let me know if the discussed problem persists. Note that Jane Street will still have to update their version of bin-prot. Regards, Markus On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:52, Damien Doligez wrote: > > On 2011-06-27, at 17:57, Markus Mottl wrote: > >> I have traced down this problem to the C-bindings of the bin-prot >> library.  When it is supposed to unmarshal bigarrays, it always >> allocates them using Fortran-layout.  But this should be C-layout for >> "bigstrings".  I will fix this in the next release.  The problem >> should not have any noticable other impact. > > > Thank you guys for solving the problem while I was in vacation. > I'm sorry we didn't catch this earlier because I didn't have > "make test" in my Makefile. > > -- Damien > > > -- > Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > -- Markus Mottl        http://www.ocaml.info        markus.mottl@gmail.com