From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3CILVcs002968 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:21:31 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkkCAPWXpE3RVdSykGdsb2JhbACleAgUAQEBAQkJDQcUBCGIc55WimiCI4VDMIhdAQEDBoVoBIVbiAeJPzo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,197,1301868000"; d="scan'208";a="105505912" Received: from mail-px0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 12 Apr 2011 20:21:25 +0200 Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so3680994pxi.9 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:21:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=co+ozRtKGkttkTJlmfxpO7h5uUyD7OpshhjjBN8nRpk=; b=e6XjHXgzv+l7pjrjycYBVkUlwhod02kibLTsCr8cWLxZIcog8WI6rIHjAUCvUf0M0a NWPLVeZjpv176iAsJLo5vIfBOKPHI2YI22FI4VJLUMTM1QUGYy2j/a3OEg2pG62I948o 3keJl9oqvNj979DQO2qYldzXofVZLk86Sv1ws= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=jeeE11X1Q5wnOxlFeJ3ffB9LivCIA8OLNwFtCZR/oR0c80e8xUv+sddUxRX3Isr/CS wd+H6Jdu8HkTO8nfxOkaIkYwN4ks5Hth8Ew2Rppb0FWLOXFAaZkJMN6YYWnsN/yZbsu7 tca/P4gBNdNaAyusyqOLvy587J/uiYU3CItW4= Received: by 10.142.203.18 with SMTP id a18mr605336wfg.397.1302632484082; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:21:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.42.232 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:21:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201104121819.p3CIJlw8019462@outgoing.mit.edu> References: <201104121819.p3CIJlw8019462@outgoing.mit.edu> From: Raoul Duke Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:21:04 -0700 Message-ID: To: OCaml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What is the safe subset of OCaml? http://www.skyhunter.com/marcs/emilyWalnut.html :-)