caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Mottl <markus.mottl@gmail.com>
To: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
Cc: xclerc <xavier.clerc@inria.fr>, "caml users" <caml-list@inria.fr>,
	"Serge Ziryukin" <ftrvxmtrx@gmail.com>,
	"Damien Doligez" <damien.doligez@inria.fr>,
	"Stéphane Glondu" <steph@glondu.net>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml 3.12.1 compatibility report
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:57:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinW-2704bW+Znfob59e3344k2UBCg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin7Kk7ASVcMnCt4zOG7UfOPqAH=Ug@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:22, Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> wrote:
> I'd be interested to understand why bin_prot ends up comparing
> bigarrays of different layouts: is this an oversight in the test suite
> or a strong requirement?

I have traced down this problem to the C-bindings of the bin-prot
library.  When it is supposed to unmarshal bigarrays, it always
allocates them using Fortran-layout.  But this should be C-layout for
"bigstrings".  I will fix this in the next release.  The problem
should not have any noticable other impact.

Regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Mottl        http://www.ocaml.info        markus.mottl@gmail.com


  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-27 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-16 15:01 Damien Doligez
2011-06-16 15:11 ` [Caml-list] " Sylvain Le Gall
2011-06-16 15:18 ` [Caml-list] " Stéphane Glondu
2011-06-16 15:33 ` Florent Ouchet
2011-06-16 17:46   ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-06-27  9:31     ` Damien Doligez
2011-06-28  8:07       ` Florent Ouchet
2011-06-16 17:59 ` Serge Ziryukin
2011-06-27 10:29   ` Stéphane Glondu
2011-06-27 12:49     ` xclerc
2011-06-27 14:40       ` Till Varoquaux
2011-06-27 15:22       ` Xavier Leroy
2011-06-27 15:57         ` Markus Mottl [this message]
2011-06-28 16:52           ` Damien Doligez
2011-06-30 21:37             ` Markus Mottl
2011-07-04 11:45               ` xclerc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTinW-2704bW+Znfob59e3344k2UBCg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=markus.mottl@gmail.com \
    --cc=Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
    --cc=ftrvxmtrx@gmail.com \
    --cc=steph@glondu.net \
    --cc=xavier.clerc@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).